Transparency
Every entry in this directory is independently researched, verified against multiple sources, and audited on a regular schedule. Here is exactly how it works.
How It Works
Did you know?
102 verified entries
Hover to learn more
Every entry in this directory is individually researched and verified against a minimum of two independent sources before publication. No self-reported data. No unverified press releases.
Did you know?
Weekly AI audit
Hover to learn more
An AI agent scans primary sources — company websites, EU project databases, arXiv, and major tech press — every week to flag stale data and propose updates for human review.
Did you know?
Confidence scoring
Hover to learn more
Each entry carries a confidence score reflecting source quality: high (peer-reviewed or official), medium (reputable press), or low (single or indirect source). Low-confidence entries are flagged for re-verification.
Did you know?
AI + human review
Hover to learn more
Full transparency means every change is attributed — AI suggestions are logged, human decisions are recorded in git history. The complete audit trail is public and permanent.
Did you know?
90-day activity rule
Hover to learn more
Entries are evaluated on a rolling 90-day window. Companies or projects with no verifiable activity in the past quarter are flagged as potentially inactive and scheduled for review.
Did you know?
Open methodology
Hover to learn more
The curation protocol, source requirements, confidence rubric, and audit schedule are all documented and public. Anyone can read exactly how this directory is built and maintained.
Our Process
Research
Primary sources are identified: official websites, EU project databases (Quantum Flagship, EuroHPC), peer-reviewed papers, and major tech press. No self-reported data is accepted at face value.
Verify
Every entry requires a minimum of two independently verified sources. Citations follow APA/IEEE style with DOI links where available. Each source includes a dateAccessed field.
Audit
An AI agent runs weekly scans to detect stale entries, new publications, and changed company status. Proposed changes are queued for human review with full reasoning.
Review
A human editor reviews all AI-proposed changes, approves or rejects each one, and commits to the repository. The complete decision log is retained in git history.